Cannon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cannon v. State

105 S.W.2d 666, 132 Tex. Crim. 536, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 320

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 10, 1937·No. No. 18770.·Published

Opinions

KRUEGER, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of property over the value of fifty dollars, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of property over the value of fifty dollars, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cannon v. State, 105 S.W.2d 666, 132 Tex. Crim. 536, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 320 (Tex. 1937).

Pincite

105 S.W.2d 666 (Cannon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.