Cannon v. State

5 Tex. Ct. App. 34
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 1, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Tex. Ct. App. 34 (Cannon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cannon v. State, 5 Tex. Ct. App. 34 (Tex. Ct. App. 1878).

Opinion

Ector, P. J.

The record before us fails to show that the defendant in the lower court pleaded to the indictment, or that, on his failure to do so, the plea of not guilty was entered for him. Without a plea there was no issue for the jury to determine. The fact that the defendant pleaded, or that a plea of not guilty was entered for him, must affirmatively appear on the record, or a judgment of conviction [35]*35will not stand. Pasc. Dig., arts. 2941, 2947, 2981; Stacey v. The State, 3 Texas Ct. App. 121; Dempsey v. The State, 3 Texas Ct. App. 429; The State v. Matthews, 20 Mo. 55. The transcript also fails to show that the jury were sworn in the case. Unless the record affirmatively shows that the jury were sworn, the judgment will be set aside.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed, and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lacefield v. State
34 Ark. 275 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Tex. Ct. App. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannon-v-state-texapp-1878.