Cannon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Cannon v. State

1935 OK CR 67, 46 P.2d 1117, 57 Okla. Crim. 169, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 40

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 7, 1935

DocketNo. A-8849.

StatusPublished

This text of 1935 OK CR 67 (Cannon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cannon v. State, 1935 OK CR 67, 46 P.2d 1117, 57 Okla. Crim. 169, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 40 (Okla. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of contempt of court and a fine of $50 imposed.

The transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on the 12th day of December, 1934. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of contempt of court and a fine of $50 imposed.

The transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on the 12th day of December, 1934. No brief has been filed in support of the defendant’s assignment of errors.

A careful examination of the record fails to disclose any fundamental or prejudicial errors. The evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

The case is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK CR 67, 46 P.2d 1117, 57 Okla. Crim. 169, 1935 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannon-v-state-oklacrimapp-1935.