Cannon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cannon v. State

271 S.W.3d 42, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1489, 2008 WL 5454176

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 12, 2008

DocketED 91070

StatusPublished

This text of 271 S.W.3d 42 (Cannon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cannon v. State, 271 S.W.3d 42, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1489, 2008 WL 5454176 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Osborne Cannon, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by informing him that the court and prosecutor would not give him the opportunity to hire private counsel to represent him at trial.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Osborne Cannon, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by informing him that the court and prosecutor would not give him the opportunity to hire private counsel to represent him at trial.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 S.W.3d 42, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1489, 2008 WL 5454176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannon-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack