Cannon v. State

105 S.E. 384, 26 Ga. App. 41, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 259
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1920
Docket11864
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 384 (Cannon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cannon v. State, 105 S.E. 384, 26 Ga. App. 41, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 259 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. There was some evidence which authorized the instructions to the jury excepted to, and they were not erroneous for any reason assigned.

2. The general grounds of the motion for a new trial, not having been argued in the belief of counsel for plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 384, 26 Ga. App. 41, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannon-v-state-gactapp-1920.