Cannon v. State

961 So. 2d 991, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10073, 2007 WL 1852182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cannon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2007·No. No. 5D06-3992·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703, 705 (Fla.1978) (reiterating that an offense must be charged “in the very language of the [992]*992statute, or in language of equivalent import”).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cannon v. State, 961 So. 2d 991, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10073, 2007 WL 1852182 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

961 So. 2d 991 (Cannon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leeman v. State
357 So. 2d 703 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)