Cannon v. Shahan
This text of 44 S.E. 824 (Cannon v. Shahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a claim case the plaintiff in fi. fa. assumed the burden. The only proof of possession by the defendant after the judgment was that he had a key to the house levied on and alleged to have been sold to the claimant, who resided at a distance; and that the defendant kept his buggy in the stable, which was also used by the public generally for that purpose. The claimant showed a sale of the property under deeds dated before the judgment, but not recorded until the date uf the levy. There was no attempt to prove, by the witnesses to the deeds or otherwise, that they were in fact executed after the judgment was rendered, and a verdict for the claimant was demanded by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 S.E. 824, 118 Ga. 99, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannon-v-shahan-ga-1903.