Cannon v. . Nowell

51 N.C. 436
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 51 N.C. 436 (Cannon v. . Nowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cannon v. . Nowell, 51 N.C. 436 (N.C. 1859).

Opinion

EuffiN, J.

The opinion of the Court coincides with that of his Honor. Heirs take by positive law when the ancestor dies intestate, and the course of descents cannot be altered by words excluding particular heirs, or by any agreement of parties. Suppose the father to have had no other child at his death but the plaintiff; being the sole heir, he must have taken the whole of the descended land esa necessitate. There *438 must, therefore, be a disposition to another, so as to break the descent, otherwise the land descends, and, of course, it descends according to law ; that is, in this case, to the heirs in general, subject to the provision for bringing advancements into hotchpot. That was decreed in this case, and the decree must be affirmed with costs in this Court.

This opinion will be certified to the Superior Court, to the end that further proceedings may be had there for executing-the decree.

Peis, Curiam, Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. McDade
124 S.E.2d 822 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Price v. Davis
93 S.E.2d 93 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
In Re the Guardianship of Reynolds
173 S.E. 789 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 N.C. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannon-v-nowell-nc-1859.