Cannon v. New York City Transit Authority
213 A.D.2d 303, 624 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3036
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered on or about August 26, 1994, which granted defendant Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff’s proof of causation consists entirely of an unsworn report of a civil engineer, which does not constitute evidentiary proof in admissible form (Rue v Stokes, 191 AD2d 245, 246-247). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cannon v. New York City Transit Authority, 213 A.D.2d 303, 624 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
213 A.D.2d 303 (Cannon v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
1212 Ocean Avenue Housing Development Corp. v. Brunatti
50 A.D.3d 1110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)