Cannon v. Dowling
242 A.D. 612, 271 N.Y.S. 1078
Opinion
Judgment reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs, on the ground that no actionable negligence on the part of the defendants was established. (See Kelly v. Manhattan R. Co., 112 N. Y. 443, and Hirsh v. Interborough R. T. Co., 229 App. Div. 703.) Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cannon v. Dowling, 242 A.D. 612, 271 N.Y.S. 1078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 612 (Cannon v. Dowling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kelly v. Manhattan Railway Co.
20 N.E. 383 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)