Cannon v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
82 A. 934, 82 N.J.L. 730, 53 Vroom 730, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 289
This text of 82 A. 934 (Cannon v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cannon v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, 82 A. 934, 82 N.J.L. 730, 53 Vroom 730, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 289 (N.J. 1912).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the above opinion delivered in that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisoh, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
82 A. 934, 82 N.J.L. 730, 53 Vroom 730, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannon-v-delaware-lackawanna-western-railroad-nj-1912.