Cannon v. City of New York
This text of 27 A.D.3d 607 (Cannon v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated April 6, 2005, as denied the defendants’ cross motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (2) to transfer venue from Kings County to New York County.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The denial of the cross motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (2) to transfer venue was a provident exercise of discretion (see Krupka v County of Westchester, 160 AD2d 681 [1990]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.3d 607, 810 N.Y.S.2d 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannon-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2006.