Cannon v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

36 S.E. 99, 111 Ga. 837, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 792
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1900·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The evidence for the plaintiff being substantially the same as when this case was here before (106 Ga. 830), and being, under the ruling then'made, insufficient to authorize a recovery against the defendant, the trial judge did not err in granting a nonsuit. Smith v. Central R. Co., 82 Ga. 801.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Fish, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cannon v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 36 S.E. 99, 111 Ga. 837, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 792 (Ga. 1900).

36 S.E. 99 (Cannon v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaulding v. Gaulding
81 S.E.2d 830 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Jackson v. Jackson
70 S.E.2d 592 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)