Canner v. Delameter
This text of 436 N.E.2d 1340 (Canner v. Delameter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. If the Town of Oneonta did not have jurisdiction over Lot 59, it could not grant a variance. If, on the other hand, the town did have jurisdiction, it cannot be said, as a matter of law, that respondents’ determination was arbitrary and capricious.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
436 N.E.2d 1340, 56 N.Y.2d 724, 451 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canner-v-delameter-ny-1982.