Cannell v. Milburn
5 F. Cas. 18, 3 D.C. 424, 3 Cranch 424
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1829
StatusPublished
This text of 5 F. Cas. 18 (Cannell v. Milburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cannell v. Milburn, 5 F. Cas. 18, 3 D.C. 424, 3 Cranch 424 (circtddc 1829).
Opinion
The Court (Moesell, J. absent,) overruled the objection, and Cranch, C. J., referred to the case of Ferguson v. Harwood, 7 Cranch, 408, where the Supreme Court held, that if the legal effect of the instrument be the same, whether the words be inserted or not, the variance is immaterial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ferguson v. Harwood
11 U.S. 408 (Supreme Court, 1813)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 F. Cas. 18, 3 D.C. 424, 3 Cranch 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannell-v-milburn-circtddc-1829.