Cannatella v. Mahoney
187 A.D.2d 425, 590 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12470
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 2, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
by the petitioners from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), dated October 2, 1990.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Mullen at the Supreme Court. Eiber, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cannatella v. Mahoney, 187 A.D.2d 425, 590 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
187 A.D.2d 425 (Cannatella v. Mahoney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barresi v. Mahoney
192 A.D.2d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)