Cannatella v. Mahoney
187 A.D.2d 425, 590 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12470
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 2, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 187 A.D.2d 425 (Cannatella v. Mahoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cannatella v. Mahoney, 187 A.D.2d 425, 590 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
by the petitioners from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), dated October 2, 1990.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Mullen at the Supreme Court. Eiber, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barresi v. Mahoney
192 A.D.2d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
187 A.D.2d 425, 590 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannatella-v-mahoney-nyappdiv-1992.