Cannata-Nowell v. Duane Reade, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 121, 716 N.Y.S.2d 569, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12121

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.H.O.), entered July 1, 1999, [122] which granted defendant’s motion to vacate its default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s motion to vacate its default in submitting an answer was properly granted (see, Scott v Fontana, 268 AD2d 237). Defendant established a reasonable excuse for its delay by setting forth its diligent efforts to deliver the summons and complaint to the correct insurance company. Defendant also presented an affidavit setting forth a meritorious defense to plaintiff’s claim based on its position that plaintiff’s injuries were caused solely by the tortious conduct of one of its patrons. Moreover, the brief delay caused no prejudice to plaintiff. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Ellerin, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cannata-Nowell v. Duane Reade, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 121, 716 N.Y.S.2d 569, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 121 (Cannata-Nowell v. Duane Reade, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Fontana
268 A.D.2d 237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)