Cannady v. Franz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cannady v. Franz

859 So. 2d 1206, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15996, 2003 WL 22415396

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 24, 2003

DocketNo. 1D03-2392

StatusPublished

This text of 859 So. 2d 1206 (Cannady v. Franz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cannady v. Franz, 859 So. 2d 1206, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15996, 2003 WL 22415396 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of June 16, 2003, and August 1, 2003, the Court has determined that the May 27, 2003, order is a nonfinal order because judicial labor appears to remain in the lower tribunal with regard to appellee Dr. Franz. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot.

ERVIN, ALLEN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of June 16, 2003, and August 1, 2003, the Court has determined that the May 27, 2003, order is a nonfinal order because judicial labor appears to remain in the lower tribunal with regard to appellee Dr. Franz. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot.

ERVIN, ALLEN and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

859 So. 2d 1206, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 15996, 2003 WL 22415396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannady-v-franz-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack