Cann v. Thompson

Superior Court of Delaware

Cann v. Thompson

5 Del. 398

DecidedJuly 5, 1852

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Del. 398 (Cann v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cann v. Thompson, 5 Del. 398 (Del. Ct. App. 1852).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

ruled out the plots. A party having been regularly notified of the time and place of laying down pretensions, is bound by the proceedings not only on that day, but on every subsequent *399 day to which the matter is adjourned. But a meeting on a different day is irregular, without special notice to the other party.

Platt, for plaintiff. Bates, for defendant.

The plaintiff afterwards had a verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

ruled out the plots. A party having been regularly notified of the time and place of laying down pretensions, is bound by the proceedings not only on that day, but on every subsequent *399 day to which the matter is adjourned. But a meeting on a different day is irregular, without special notice to the other party.

Platt, for plaintiff. Bates, for defendant.

The plaintiff afterwards had a verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Del. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cann-v-thompson-delsuperct-1852.