Cann v. Cunningham
91 A.3d 1233, 625 Pa. 345, 2014 WL 1884498, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1172
This text of 91 A.3d 1233 (Cann v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cann v. Cunningham, 91 A.3d 1233, 625 Pa. 345, 2014 WL 1884498, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1172 (Pa. 2014).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 A.3d 1233, 625 Pa. 345, 2014 WL 1884498, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cann-v-cunningham-pa-2014.