Cann v. Boeing Employees Credit Union

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: February 2, 2023
• Docket: 2:23-cv-00076
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 D’VOREAUX CANN, CASE NO. C23-0076-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 BOEING EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNTION, 13 Defendant. 14

15 This matter comes before the Court on sua sponte pre-service section 1915(e)(2)(B) 16 review of Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 7). Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed 17 an application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Dkt. No. 1), which the Honorable S. Kate 18 Vaughan, United States Magistrate Judge, granted (Dkt. No. 3). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the 19 Court must review and dismiss before service the lawsuit of any person seeking to proceed in 20 forma pauperis if it is “frivolous or malicious; fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 21 granted; or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 23 To state a claim upon which relief may be granted, a complaint must contain sufficient 24 factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. Ashcroft v. 25 Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 664 (2009). The factual allegations must be “enough to raise a right to relief 26 1 above the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). The 2 complaint may be dismissed if it lacks a cognizable legal theory or states insufficient facts to 3 support one. Zixiang v. Kerry, 710 F.3d 995, 999 (9th Cir. 2013). 4 The Court holds pro se pleadings to a less stringent standard than ones drafted by lawyers 5 and liberally construes them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 6 U.S. 89, 93 (2007). When dismissing a complaint under § 1915(e), the Court gives pro se 7 plaintiffs leave to amend unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could 8 not be cured by amendment. Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1006 (9th Cir. 1995). 9 Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff 10 alleges Defendant made a billing error in violation of the Fair Credit Billing Act (“FCBA”), 11 codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1666. (Dkt. No. 7 at 6.) Plaintiff also cites various other statutory and 12 regulatory provisions related to billing errors and financial disclosures. (Id.) Under the FCBA, 13 within sixty days of receipt of a billing statement, an obligor may send written notice to the 14 creditor indicating the obligor believes there was a billing error. 15 U.S.C. § 1666(a). The 15 creditor must then send written acknowledgment of the notice and either make appropriate 16 corrections or provide a written explanation why the billing statement was correct. Id. 17 Here, Plaintiff provides no factual support for his claim that Defendant committed a 18 billing error that it failed to correct. (See generally Dkt. No. 7.) In fact, the documents he does 19 provide accompanying the complaint seem to indicate that Defendant has met its obligation to 20 provide a written explanation why the billing statement was correct. (Dkt. No. 7-11.) Thus, the 21 facts Plaintiff presents do not support a claim for relief. 22 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 7) is DISMISSED without 23 prejudice for failure to state a claim. However, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file 24 amended complaint curing the above-noted deficiencies within twenty-one (21) days of the date 25 of this order. If no amended complaint is timely filed or if Plaintiff files an amended complaint 26 that fails to correct the deficiencies identified above, the Court may dismiss Plaintiff’s claims 1 with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which 2 relief may be granted. 3 Plaintiff is advised that an amended complaint operates as a complete substitute for an 4 original complaint. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992). Thus, any 5 amended complaint must clearly identify the defendant(s), the claims asserted, the specific facts 6 which Plaintiff believes support each claim, and the specific relief requested. 7 The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a copy of this order as well as the appropriate 8 forms so that he may file an amended complaint. 9 10 DATED this 2nd day of February 2023. A 11 12 13 John C. Coughenour 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26