Canion v. States
52 Cust. Ct. 329, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3583
United States Customs Court·Decided April 27, 1964·No. No. 68486. protests 60/2171 and 60/2201 (Galveston)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of frozen fish in blocks similar in all material respects-to that the subject of The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), and Amende-Schultz et al. v. United States (48 Cust. Ct. 142, C.D. 2327), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as-to all of the merchandise covered by protest 60/2171 and as to such merchandise-in protest 60/2201, invoiced as cod fillet blocks.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Canion v. States, 52 Cust. Ct. 329, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3583 (cusc 1964).
52 Cust. Ct. 329 (Canion v. States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lee Herrmann Co. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 49 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
Amende-Schultz v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 142 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)