Canion v. States
This text of 52 Cust. Ct. 329 (Canion v. States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of frozen fish in blocks similar in all material respects-to that the subject of The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), and Amende-Schultz et al. v. United States (48 Cust. Ct. 142, C.D. 2327), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as-to all of the merchandise covered by protest 60/2171 and as to such merchandise-in protest 60/2201, invoiced as cod fillet blocks.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Cust. Ct. 329, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canion-v-states-cusc-1964.