Canion v. States

52 Cust. Ct. 329, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3583
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 27, 1964
DocketNo. 68486. protests 60/2171 and 60/2201 (Galveston)
StatusPublished

This text of 52 Cust. Ct. 329 (Canion v. States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Canion v. States, 52 Cust. Ct. 329, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3583 (cusc 1964).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of frozen fish in blocks similar in all material respects-to that the subject of The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), and Amende-Schultz et al. v. United States (48 Cust. Ct. 142, C.D. 2327), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as-to all of the merchandise covered by protest 60/2171 and as to such merchandise-in protest 60/2201, invoiced as cod fillet blocks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee Herrmann Co. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 49 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)
Amende-Schultz v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 142 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Cust. Ct. 329, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canion-v-states-cusc-1964.