Canino v. Pierce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Canino v. Pierce

276 A.D.2d 1051

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 1051 (Canino v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Canino v. Pierce, 276 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

All concur as to the reversal and dismissal of the complaint as to defendant Sehriber; all concur as to the reversal and new trial as to defendant Pierce, except McCurn, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance as to the defendant Pierce. (See Caveney v. McCrory Stores Corp., 219 App. Div. 853.) (The judgment appealed from is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

All concur as to the reversal and dismissal of the complaint as to defendant Sehriber; all concur as to the reversal and new trial as to defendant Pierce, except McCurn, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance as to the defendant Pierce. (See Caveney v. McCrory Stores Corp., 219 App. Div. 853.) (The judgment appealed from is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Kimball and Piper, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canino-v-pierce-nyappdiv-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack