Canine Consulting, Inc. v. 563 East Tremont LLC

132 A.D.3d 461, 17 N.Y.S.3d 632
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 13, 2015·No. 15852N 650498/14·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about February 9, 2015, which denied plaintiff tenant’s motion to stay defendant landlord’s Civil Court action to recover the premises for nonpayment of rent or, in the alternative, to consolidate the Civil Court action with the instant action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s claims in this action may be asserted as either defenses or counterclaims in defendant’s summary nonpayment proceeding in Civil Court (see Simens v Darwish, 105 AD3d 686 [1st Dept 2013]). Plaintiff has not shown that it could not obtain complete relief in Civil Court (see Cox v J.D. Realty Assoc., 217 AD2d 179 [1st Dept 1995]). To the extent plaintiff argues that its potential defenses or counterclaims will be compromised by the limited discovery available in Civil Court, we reject this argument (see Brecker v 295 Cent. Park W., Inc., 71 AD3d 564 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Canine Consulting, Inc. v. 563 East Tremont LLC, 132 A.D.3d 461, 17 N.Y.S.3d 632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

132 A.D.3d 461 (Canine Consulting, Inc. v. 563 East Tremont LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fifth Ave. 25G LLC v. Sambar
2023 NY Slip Op 05187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)