Canimpex v. United States
This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 717 (Canimpex v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When tbe above-enumerated appeal for a reap-praisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and the case was ordered submitted.
In conformity with the requirements of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2631), I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 Cust. Ct. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canimpex-v-united-states-cusc-1958.