Cangro v. Rosado

111 A.D.3d 422, 974 N.Y.S.2d 248
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 7, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 111 A.D.3d 422 (Cangro v. Rosado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cangro v. Rosado, 111 A.D.3d 422, 974 N.Y.S.2d 248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

— Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered August 9, 2012, which denied plaintiffs motion for reargument of the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper. Flaintiff is enjoined from commencing any litigation or making any motions against defendant without the prior permission of the appropriate administrative judge.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (D'Andrea v Hutchins, 69 AD3d 541 [1st Dept 2010]).

In light of plaintiffs extraordinary history of frivolous and abusive litigation, including this meritless action against her former guardian (see e.g. Cangro v Cangro, 288 AD2d 417 [2d Dept 2001]; Cangro v Solomon, 2010 NY Slip Op 31980[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2010], vacatur denied 2011 NY Slip Op 87844[U] [1st Dept 2011], appeal dismissed, lv dismissed 19 NY3d 990 [2012]), plaintiff is restrained from commencing further proceedings against her without prior judicial permission. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Richter and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forbes v. Giacomo
130 A.D.3d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A.D.3d 422, 974 N.Y.S.2d 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cangro-v-rosado-nyappdiv-2013.