Cangro v. Reitano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cangro v. Reitano

130 A.D.3d 486, 11 N.Y.S.3d 855

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 9, 2015·No. 15671 100381/13·Published

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered August 5, 2014, dismissing the complaint, granting defendant a protective order, and awarding a sanction against plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action, plaintiff raises claims identical to those she raised in a prior action that was dismissed as res judicata (Cangro v Reitano, 92 AD3d 483 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 965 [2012]).

The award of sanctions against plaintiff and a protective order in favor of defendant are fully supported by the record (see Levy v Carol Mgt. Corp., 260 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 1999]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Renwick, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered August 5, 2014, dismissing the complaint, granting defendant a protective order, and awarding a sanction against plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action, plaintiff raises claims identical to those she raised in a prior action that was dismissed as res judicata (Cangro v Reitano, 92 AD3d 483 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 965 [2012]).

The award of sanctions against plaintiff and a protective order in favor of defendant are fully supported by the record (see Levy v Carol Mgt. Corp., 260 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 1999]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Renwick, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.

Cangro v. Reitano, 130 A.D.3d 486, 11 N.Y.S.3d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

130 A.D.3d 486 (Cangro v. Reitano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related