Cangro v. Reitano
This text of 130 A.D.3d 486 (Cangro v. Reitano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered August 5, 2014, dismissing the complaint, granting defendant a protective order, and awarding a sanction against plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this action, plaintiff raises claims identical to those she raised in a prior action that was dismissed as res judicata (Cangro v Reitano, 92 AD3d 483 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 965 [2012]).
The award of sanctions against plaintiff and a protective order in favor of defendant are fully supported by the record (see Levy v Carol Mgt. Corp., 260 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 1999]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Renwick, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
130 A.D.3d 486, 11 N.Y.S.3d 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cangro-v-reitano-nyappdiv-2015.