Cangro v. Marangos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cangro v. Marangos

90 A.D.3d 470, 933 N.Y.2d 866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A.D.3d 470 (Cangro v. Marangos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cangro v. Marangos, 90 A.D.3d 470, 933 N.Y.2d 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Apart from the fact that the complaint amounts to an impermissible collateral attack on plaintiffs divorce judgment, it fails to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). The fraud allegations are insufficiently detailed (see CPLR 3016 [b]), and the remaining allegations consist of bare legal conclusions (see Caniglia v Chicago Tribune-N.Y. News Syndicate, 204 AD2d 233 [1994]). Concur — Andrias, J.P, Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Apart from the fact that the complaint amounts to an impermissible collateral attack on plaintiffs divorce judgment, it fails to state a cause of action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). The fraud allegations are insufficiently detailed (see CPLR 3016 [b]), and the remaining allegations consist of bare legal conclusions (see Caniglia v Chicago Tribune-N.Y. News Syndicate, 204 AD2d 233 [1994]). Concur — Andrias, J.P, Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A.D.3d 470, 933 N.Y.2d 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cangro-v-marangos-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack