Cangemi v. Cuttner Fur Blending Corp.

269 A.D. 688, 54 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3293

This text of 269 A.D. 688 (Cangemi v. Cuttner Fur Blending Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cangemi v. Cuttner Fur Blending Corp., 269 A.D. 688, 54 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

— Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements and the motion to strike out the second defense granted. (Campbell v. Mandel Auto Parts Corp. [689]*689264 App. Div. 701; O’Neil v. Brooklyn Sav. Bank, 267 App. Div. 317, affd. 293 N. Y. 666; Fleming v. Post, 146 F. 2d 441.) Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fleming v. Post
146 F.2d 441 (Second Circuit, 1944)
O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank
56 N.E.2d 259 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank
267 A.D. 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 688, 54 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cangemi-v-cuttner-fur-blending-corp-nyappdiv-1945.