Cangemi v. Cuttner Fur Blending Corp.
269 A.D. 688, 54 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3293
Opinion
— Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements and the motion to strike out the second defense granted. (Campbell v. Mandel Auto Parts Corp. [689] 264 App. Div. 701; O’Neil v. Brooklyn Sav. Bank, 267 App. Div. 317, affd. 293 N. Y. 666; Fleming v. Post, 146 F. 2d 441.) Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cangemi v. Cuttner Fur Blending Corp., 269 A.D. 688, 54 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 688 (Cangemi v. Cuttner Fur Blending Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fleming v. Post
146 F.2d 441 (Second Circuit, 1944)
O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank
56 N.E.2d 259 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
O'Neil v. Brooklyn Savings Bank
267 A.D. 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)