Cangelosi v. Picadilly Cafeteria
This text of 31 So. 3d 957 (Cangelosi v. Picadilly Cafeteria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant seeks review of an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) finding that Claimant presented no medical evidence proving that the compensable injuries are the major contributing cause of the injuries for which Claimant seeks compensation. Claimant argues, in part, that the JCC erred in applying the concept of “major contributing cause” to her request for benefits. On that point, we agree. That concept is inapplicable here, because Claimant was injured on November 24, 1990, and the Legislature did not implement that higher standard of proof until January 1, 1994. See Ch. 93-415, § 2, Laws of Fla. (amending section 440.02(32), Fla. Stat.). The applicable standard of proof is the less-stringent “causal connection” standard. See Mangold v. Rainforest Golf Sports Ctr., 675 So.2d 639, 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The JCC’s finding that Claimant failed to meet the stricter standard does not address whether Claimant met the lesser standard so as to prove entitlement to benefits.
REVERSED and REMANDED for additional findings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 So. 3d 957, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4693, 2010 WL 1407653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cangelosi-v-picadilly-cafeteria-fladistctapp-2010.