Canfield v. State
This text of 244 A.D. 888 (Canfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed on the facts and new findings made. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment we exercise the power given us by section 584 of the Civil Practice Act to reverse certain findings and make new findings. (Ely v. Barrett, 224 N. Y. 550; Rives v. Bartlett, 215 id. 33, 38; Reich v. Cochran, 196 App. Div. 248, 254; appeal dismissed, 236 N. Y. 576; writ of error dismissed, 265 U. S. 574; Fraser v. Kent, 194 App. Div. 742.) All concur. (The judgment dismisses a claim for personal injuries caused by automobile skidding on highway.) Present •— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canfield-v-state-nyappdiv-1935.