Canfield v. State

244 A.D. 888
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·No. Claim No. 23587·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed on the facts and new findings made. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment we exercise the power given us by section 584 of the Civil Practice Act to reverse certain findings and make new findings. (Ely v. Barrett, 224 N. Y. 550; Rives v. Bartlett, 215 id. 33, 38; Reich v. Cochran, 196 App. Div. 248, 254; appeal dismissed, 236 N. Y. 576; writ of error dismissed, 265 U. S. 574; Fraser v. Kent, 194 App. Div. 742.) All concur. (The judgment dismisses a claim for personal injuries caused by automobile skidding on highway.) Present •— Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Canfield v. State, 244 A.D. 888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

244 A.D. 888 (Canfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
199 Misc. 499 (New York State Court of Claims, 1951)
Nichols v. State
198 Misc. 791 (New York State Court of Claims, 1950)
Torrey v. State
175 Misc. 259 (New York State Court of Claims, 1940)