Canfield v. Penney Company

403 F.2d 720
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 11, 1968·No. 32562_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

403 F.2d 720

Doreen E. CANFIELD, and infant, by Doris A. Canfield, her
Guardian ad Litem, and Doris A. Canfield,
Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Appellants,
v.
J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, Inc. and Crown Juvenile Products,
Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Appellees, and
Well-Made Baby Products Co., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 165, 169, Dockets 32545, 32562.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 5, 1968.
Decided Dec. 11, 1968.

Leonard Feldman, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees-appellants.

Joseph P. Napoli, New York City (McLaughlin, Fiscella & Biancheri, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant-appellee, J. C. Penney Co., Inc.

Arthur N. Seiff, New York City (Michels, Walton, Cullen & Mele, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant-appellee, Crown Juvenile Products, Inc.

William F. McNulty, New York City (Zweibel, Steger & Foster, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee, Well-Made Baby Products Co.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge, and FRANKEL, District Judge.1

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed.

1

Sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Canfield v. Penney Company, 403 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1968).

403 F.2d 720 (Canfield v. Penney Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related