Canfield v. Orso (In re Orso)

Fifth Circuit

Canfield v. Orso (In re Orso)

242 F.3d 534, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2230, 2001 WL 128347

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 9, 2001

DocketNo. 98-31008

StatusPublished

This text of 242 F.3d 534 (Canfield v. Orso (In re Orso)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Canfield v. Orso (In re Orso), 242 F.3d 534, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2230, 2001 WL 128347 (5th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service has requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Paul William Orso, and a majority of the judges in active service have voted in favor of granting the rehearing en banc. Further, a majority of the judges in active service have determined, on the court’s own motion, to rehear this case en banc as to Martin A. Schott.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service has requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Paul William Orso, and a majority of the judges in active service have voted in favor of granting the rehearing en banc. Further, a majority of the judges in active service have determined, on the court’s own motion, to rehear this case en banc as to Martin A. Schott.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 F.3d 534, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2230, 2001 WL 128347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canfield-v-orso-in-re-orso-ca5-2001.