Canfield v. Orso (In re Orso)

Fifth Circuit

Canfield v. Orso (In re Orso)

242 F.3d 534, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2230, 2001 WL 128347

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 9, 2001·No. No. 98-31008·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service has requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Paul William Orso, and a majority of the judges in active service have voted in favor of granting the rehearing en banc. Further, a majority of the judges in active service have determined, on the court’s own motion, to rehear this case en banc as to Martin A. Schott.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service has requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Paul William Orso, and a majority of the judges in active service have voted in favor of granting the rehearing en banc. Further, a majority of the judges in active service have determined, on the court’s own motion, to rehear this case en banc as to Martin A. Schott.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Canfield v. Orso (In re Orso), 242 F.3d 534, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2230, 2001 WL 128347 (5th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

242 F.3d 534 (Canfield v. Orso (In re Orso)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.