Canfield v. Moreschi
This text of 64 N.E.2d 177 (Canfield v. Moreschi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The limited injunction here granted against defendant International Union was appropriate and valid a procedural device for furnishing adequate protection to plaintiffs. We affirm the judgment, as against defendant International Union, on that sole ground. So doing, we find it unnecessary to pass, and do not in any way pass, on the correctness of any of the findings of fact or conclusions of law which purport to decide, or imply, that defendant International Union, or its members (other than its International officers) are responsible or liable for any of the wrongs committed against plaintiffs by the other defendants.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ., concur; Lehman, Ch. J., deceased.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 N.E.2d 177, 294 N.Y. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canfield-v-moreschi-ny-1945.