Canfield v. Gaylord

New York Supreme Court

Canfield v. Gaylord

12 Wend. 236

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 20, 1834

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 12 Wend. 236 (Canfield v. Gaylord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Canfield v. Gaylord, 12 Wend. 236 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The defendants who obtained a verdict are entitled to a full bill of costs against the plaintiffs. 2 R. S. 616, § 18. The statute gives them their costs; and although the same services which were rendered for them were also rendered for the other defendant, against whom the plaintiff recovered, still, as the statute has not prescribed any rule of apportionment in such a case, it is not in the power of the court to make it. The defendants, however, have no right to make up a separate record ; they are entitled to have a judgment for costs in their favor, incorporated into the [237]*237plaintiff’s record ; and if he refuses so to make up his record, the court will compel him to do it. The items in relation to a separate judgment having been stricken out by the taxing officer, there is no necessity for a re-taxation.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The defendants who obtained a verdict are entitled to a full bill of costs against the plaintiffs. 2 R. S. 616, § 18. The statute gives them their costs; and although the same services which were rendered for them were also rendered for the other defendant, against whom the plaintiff recovered, still, as the statute has not prescribed any rule of apportionment in such a case, it is not in the power of the court to make it. The defendants, however, have no right to make up a separate record ; they are entitled to have a judgment for costs in their favor, incorporated into the [237]*237plaintiff’s record ; and if he refuses so to make up his record, the court will compel him to do it. The items in relation to a separate judgment having been stricken out by the taxing officer, there is no necessity for a re-taxation.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Wend. 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canfield-v-gaylord-nysupct-1834.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack