Canfield v. Garrett

First Circuit

Canfield v. Garrett

911 F.2d 721, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12458, 1990 WL 116757

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJuly 26, 1990

Docket90-1415

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 911 F.2d 721 (Canfield v. Garrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Canfield v. Garrett, 911 F.2d 721, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12458, 1990 WL 116757 (1st Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

911 F.2d 721

Canfield (Robert A.), Trustee for Linwood R.T. Garrett & Company
v.
Garrett (Linwood R.T.), Hanover County, City of Richmond,
State of Virginia, Dept. of Taxation, High Mileage Tire Co.,
Inc., Steel Services, Glamorgan Pipe & Foundry Co., Buhrman
& Sons, Inc., Producers Cooperative, Inc., Strickland
Foundry & Machine Co., Inc., Vulcan Materials Co., R. Stuart
Royer & Associates, First & Merchants National Bank, n/k/a Sovran Bank

NO. 90-1415

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

JUL 26, 1990

Appeal From: E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI