Candino v. Starpoint Central School District

17 N.E.3d 1134, 24 N.Y.3d 925
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2014·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in denying claimant’s application to file and serve a late notice of claim (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 NY3d 531 [2006]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Candino v. Starpoint Central School District, 17 N.E.3d 1134, 24 N.Y.3d 925 (N.Y. 2014).

17 N.E.3d 1134 (Candino v. Starpoint Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Dusch v. Erie County Med. Ctr.
2020 NY Slip Op 3351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Szymkowiak v. New York Power Auth.
2018 NY Slip Op 4482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Ficek v. Akron Central School District
144 A.D.3d 1601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)