Home/New York Court of Appeals/Candino v. Starpoint Central School District

Candino v. Starpoint Central School District

17 N.E.3d 1134, 24 N.Y.3d 925
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 4, 2014
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 17 N.E.3d 1134 (Candino v. Starpoint Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Candino v. Starpoint Central School District, 17 N.E.3d 1134, 24 N.Y.3d 925 (N.Y. 2014).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in denying claimant’s application to file and serve a late notice of claim (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 NY3d 531 [2006]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Dusch v. Erie County Med. Ctr.
2020 NY Slip Op 3351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Szymkowiak v. New York Power Auth.
2018 NY Slip Op 4482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Ficek v. Akron Central School District
144 A.D.3d 1601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 N.E.3d 1134, 24 N.Y.3d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/candino-v-starpoint-central-school-district-ny-2014.