Candie Lynn Walker v. State of Florida

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 6, 2022
DocketSC21-1327
StatusPublished

This text of Candie Lynn Walker v. State of Florida (Candie Lynn Walker v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Candie Lynn Walker v. State of Florida, (Fla. 2022).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC21-1327 ____________

CANDIE LYNN WALKER, Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

January 6, 2022

LAWSON, J.

Petitioner, Candie Lynn Walker, through counsel, seeks to

invoke this Court’s discretionary jurisdiction under article V,

section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution, which allows us to

review, among other things, “any decision of a district court of

appeal that . . . expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of

another district court of appeal . . . on the same question of law.”

Counsel’s jurisdictional brief argues that we are empowered to

review the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Walker v.

State, 324 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021), because it conflicts with a decision in another case “decided in the same district court of

appeal.” This argument is contrary to the plain language of our

constitution, which only grants discretionary jurisdiction under this

clause when a decision from one district court “conflicts with a

decision of another district court of appeal.” Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.

Const. (emphasis added). Not surprisingly, our precedent also

makes clear that “[t]his Court’s jurisdiction does not extend to

intra-district conflict.” Terry v. State, 808 So. 2d 1249, 1250 n.1

(Fla. 2002).

Because the only jurisdictional argument presented in

Walker’s brief is contrary to our constitution and precedent, we

deny Walker’s petition.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict of Decisions

First District - Case No. 1D20-608

(Escambia County)

-2- Philip J. Massa of Philip J. Massa, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida,

for Petitioner

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Respondent

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
808 So. 2d 1249 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Candie Lynn Walker v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/candie-lynn-walker-v-state-of-florida-fla-2022.