Candice Latrice Alexander v. State
This text of Candice Latrice Alexander v. State (Candice Latrice Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00374-CR
NO. 03-09-00375-CR
NO. 03-09-00376-CR
Candice Alexander, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOS. D-1-DC-07-302725, D-1-DC-08-300740, D-1-DC-08-300741
HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Candice Alexander seeks to appeal her convictions for criminal mischief and credit card abuse. The record reflects that after filing her notice of appeal, Alexander filed a waiver of her right to appeal in the trial court. Alexander's counsel also notified this Court of Alexander's waiver of the right to appeal. A waiver of the right to appeal that is freely and voluntarily made is binding upon the appellant. Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). After such a waiver is made, the trial court's permission is required before a defendant may appeal. Id. Because the record does not reflect that Alexander obtained the trial court's permission to appeal after filing her waiver, the appeal is dismissed.
___________________________________________
Diane M. Henson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: August 21, 2009
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Candice Latrice Alexander v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/candice-latrice-alexander-v-state-texapp-2009.