Candice Jackson v. Kell Auto Sales, Inc. and Robert I. Harmon
This text of Candice Jackson v. Kell Auto Sales, Inc. and Robert I. Harmon (Candice Jackson v. Kell Auto Sales, Inc. and Robert I. Harmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-21-00106-CV
CANDICE JACKSON, Appellant § On Appeal from the 89th District Court
§ of Wichita County (DC89-CV2020-1237)
V. § November 18, 2021
§ Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker
KELL AUTO SALES, INC. AND ROBERT § Concurring Memorandum Opinion by I. HARMON, Appellees Justice Wallach
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there
was no reversible error in the trial court’s amended order denying the motion to
dismiss based on the Texas Citizens Participation Act. It is ordered that this portion
of the trial court’s amended order is affirmed.
It is further ordered that appellant Candice Jackson shall bear the costs of this
appeal, for which let execution issue. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By /s/ Brian Walker Justice Brian Walker
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Candice Jackson v. Kell Auto Sales, Inc. and Robert I. Harmon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/candice-jackson-v-kell-auto-sales-inc-and-robert-i-harmon-texapp-2021.