Candelario Cerda, Jr. v. State
This text of Candelario Cerda, Jr. v. State (Candelario Cerda, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00076-CR
Candelario Cerda, Jr., Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR-10-0912, HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER PER CURIAM
Appellant Candelario Cerda, Jr. filed his notice of appeal on January 21, 2014. Cerda
requested and received 120 days of extension of time to file his brief, but he has exceeded that time
and the brief has not been filed.
On December 5, 2014, Cerda’s retained counsel, Daniel H. Wannamaker, filed
another motion for extension of time requesting an additional 60 days to file appellant’s brief. We
grant the motion in part and order Daniel H. Wannamaker to file appellant’s brief on or before
January 20, 2015. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why
he should not be held in contempt of court.
It is ordered on December 12, 2014.
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Candelario Cerda, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/candelario-cerda-jr-v-state-texapp-2014.