Candelaria v. State
937 So. 2d 1266, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16371, 2006 WL 2787527
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 2006·No. No. 2D06-2368·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order of the trial court because Mr. Candelaria did not comply substantially with the requirements of section 941.45, Florida Statutes (2005). See Torres-Arboledo v. State, 524 So.2d 403 (Fla.1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Candelaria v. State, 937 So. 2d 1266, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16371, 2006 WL 2787527 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
937 So. 2d 1266 (Candelaria v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Massaline v. State
937 So. 2d 1266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)