Candelaria v. State

937 So. 2d 1266, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16371, 2006 WL 2787527
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 2006
DocketNo. 2D06-2368
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 937 So. 2d 1266 (Candelaria v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Candelaria v. State, 937 So. 2d 1266, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16371, 2006 WL 2787527 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

We affirm the order of the trial court because Mr. Candelaria did not comply substantially with the requirements of section 941.45, Florida Statutes (2005). See Torres-Arboledo v. State, 524 So.2d 403 (Fla.1988).

STRINGER and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Massaline v. State
937 So. 2d 1266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
937 So. 2d 1266, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16371, 2006 WL 2787527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/candelaria-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.