Candela v. New York Central System

Ohio Supreme Court

Candela v. New York Central System

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 373

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 21, 1960

DocketNo. 36536

StatusPublished

This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 373 (Candela v. New York Central System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Candela v. New York Central System, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 373 (Ohio 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court of Appeals was in error in rendering final judgment after reversing the judgment of the trial court on the weight of the evidence. Its sole function was to set aside the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial. In re Adoption of Cassada, ante, 368. Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Weygan-dt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Court of Appeals was in error in rendering final judgment after reversing the judgment of the trial court on the weight of the evidence. Its sole function was to set aside the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial. In re Adoption of Cassada, ante, 368. Therefore, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Weygan-dt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/candela-v-new-york-central-system-ohio-1960.