Candela Laser Corporation and Gaelis Corporation v. Cynosure, Inc.
This text of 56 F.3d 82 (Candela Laser Corporation and Gaelis Corporation v. Cynosure, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
56 F.3d 82
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
CANDELA LASER CORPORATION and Gaelis Corporation,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CYNOSURE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-1514.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 11, 1995.
Before RICH, LOURIE, and RADER, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F.3d 82, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19645, 1995 WL 298916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/candela-laser-corporation-and-gaelis-corporation-v-cafc-1995.