Candala v. Schenectady Orpheum Theatre Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Candala v. Schenectady Orpheum Theatre Co.

162 A.D. 919, 146 N.Y.S. 1085

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D. 919 (Candala v. Schenectady Orpheum Theatre Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Candala v. Schenectady Orpheum Theatre Co., 162 A.D. 919, 146 N.Y.S. 1085 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the damages to $250, in which cáse the judgment, as so modified, and order affirmed, without costs. The court disapproves of the finding of fact that the defendant' had knowledge of the quarrelsome disposition of its employee, the court finding that no exemplary damages are warranted by the evidence. All concurred, except Woodward, J., who voted for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the damages to $250, in which cáse the judgment, as so modified, and order affirmed, without costs. The court disapproves of the finding of fact that the defendant' had knowledge of the quarrelsome disposition of its employee, the court finding that no exemplary damages are warranted by the evidence. All concurred, except Woodward, J., who voted for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D. 919, 146 N.Y.S. 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/candala-v-schenectady-orpheum-theatre-co-nyappdiv-1914.