Cancell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Cancell v. State

132 So. 607, 24 Ala. App. 197, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 205

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 10, 1931

Docket8 Div. 299.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 So. 607 (Cancell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cancell v. State, 132 So. 607, 24 Ala. App. 197, 1931 Ala. App. LEXIS 205 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted' of the offense of petit larceny.

The property alleged to have been stolen — several gallons of gasoline — was charged, in the affidavit upon which appellant was tried, to have been the property of “Franklin County.” This was sufficient, as against the demurrers interposed. Sands et al. v. State, 80 Ala. 201.

The testimony offered on behalf of the state tended directly to show the guilt of appellant as charged; that offered on behalf of appellant was in denial. The issues were for the jury. We discover nothing worthy of further comment.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI