Cancela v. Falu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cancela v. Falu

175 A.D.2d 767

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 28, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred W. Eggert, J.), entered on August 26, 1991, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of remanding for a further hearing addressed to the individual validity of any of the signatures collected by Ana Cancela. We do not concur with the hearing court’s determination that the error recurring in this witness’ attestation by which she designated an erroneous election district, is sufficient, standing alone, to invalidate her six petition sheets in toto. No opinion. Concur— Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred W. Eggert, J.), entered on August 26, 1991, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of remanding for a further hearing addressed to the individual validity of any of the signatures collected by Ana Cancela. We do not concur with the hearing court’s determination that the error recurring in this witness’ attestation by which she designated an erroneous election district, is sufficient, standing alone, to invalidate her six petition sheets in toto. No opinion. Concur— Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin.

Cancela v. Falu, 175 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

175 A.D.2d 767 (Cancela v. Falu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related