Canastuj-Tzul v. State

128 So. 3d 76, 2013 WL 3924070, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11995
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 2013
DocketNo. 4D13-260
StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 3d 76 (Canastuj-Tzul v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Canastuj-Tzul v. State, 128 So. 3d 76, 2013 WL 3924070, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11995 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Chaidez v. United States, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 1103, 185 L.Ed.2d 149 (2013); Hernandez v. State, 124 So.3d 757 (Fla.2012).

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chaidez v. United States
133 S. Ct. 1103 (Supreme Court, 2013)
Hernandez v. State
124 So. 3d 757 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 So. 3d 76, 2013 WL 3924070, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canastuj-tzul-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.