Canario v. BYRNES EXPRESS & TRUCKING, CO., INC.

652 F. Supp. 385, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4986
District Court, E.D. New York·Decided January 16, 1987·No. 85 Civ. 4209·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

STIPULATION AND ORDER

WEXLER, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed, by and between the undersigned attorneys, that in consideration of the settlement of this matter on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the Memorandum and Order of this Court, dated September 16, 1986, 644 F.Supp. 744, be, and the same hereby is, withdrawn. All publishers which were given notice of said Memorandum and Order shall be given notice of this Order of Withdrawal and directed not to publish said Memorandum and Order, or, in the event it has already been published, to publish a notice of this Order of Withdrawal.

O’CONNOR & MANGAN, P.C.
By: -
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Long Island City, N.Y. MATTHEW J. VETRI, ESQ.
By: -
Attorneys for Defendants Brooklyn, N.Y.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Canario v. BYRNES EXPRESS & TRUCKING, CO., INC., 652 F. Supp. 385, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4986 (E.D.N.Y. 1987).

652 F. Supp. 385 (Canario v. BYRNES EXPRESS & TRUCKING, CO., INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glover v. SDR Cartage Co., Inc.
681 F. Supp. 1293 (N.D. Illinois, 1988)