Canandaigua National Bank v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
108 N.E. 1109, 214 N.Y. 694, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1413
This text of 108 N.E. 1109 (Canandaigua National Bank v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Canandaigua National Bank v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co., 108 N.E. 1109, 214 N.Y. 694, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1413 (N.Y. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Miller, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
108 N.E. 1109, 214 N.Y. 694, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canandaigua-national-bank-v-cleveland-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-ny-1915.