Canandaigua National Bank v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

108 N.E. 1109, 214 N.Y. 694, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1413
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 1915·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Miller, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Canandaigua National Bank v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co., 108 N.E. 1109, 214 N.Y. 694, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1413 (N.Y. 1915).

108 N.E. 1109 (Canandaigua National Bank v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.